Browse an up-to-date collection of news from the major scientific and media publishers. Click on the news to be immediately redirected to the original source. Please contact us about any other relevant news.
Sure Genomics, a startup based in Utah, launched a genetic testing service today that costs a whopping $2,500 upfront, with an additional $150 subscription fee that guarantees DNA analysis updates every six months.
9 February 2016, The Verge
The price is unusually high for a direct-to-consumer genetics company, since 23andMe and Ancestry offer genetics reports for $199 and $99, respectively. But Sure Genomics says it’s worth it; customers who pay the fee will get their entire genome sequenced, and unlike others, the startup says it won’t sell anonymized genetic information to third parties to turn a profit…Read more >>>
Can you imagine seeing the face of your unborn child at age 18? Things are moving quickly in the field of genomics.
2 February 2016, Science Magazine
The first article of this column described the coming Practical Genomics Revolution as evidenced by the creation of 11 genomic medicine centres under the auspices of the 100,000 Genomes projects led by Genomics England. Now, the initial results are in. More than 6,000 genomes have been analysed and the project will receive another £250 million in funding in 2016…Read more >>>
19 January 2016, GenomeWeb
In a pilot study published online last week in Genetics in Medicine, the team, led by scientists at the École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne and the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics in Lausanne, tested the implementation of privacy-preserving genetic testing and reporting for 230 HIV-infected patients…Read more >>>
14 January 2016, MedCityNews
“I think privacy is going to be really hard to keep, unless you walk around in a hermetically sealed plastic suit,” said Mason, an assistant professor of computational genomics at Weill Cornell Medical College. “You lose cells wherever you walk.”…Read more >>>
The Japanese government has decided to revise the country’s privacy laws in order to clarify protections for personal genetic data, ending ongoing uncertainty around the legal status of genome-based information.
29 December 2015, The Global Legal Post
TOn Friday, an expert panel compiled by the government of Japan decided that the country’s privacy laws ought to treat genome data as personal identification codes, akin to fingerprints or digitized facial feature maps. As such, genetic data will be legally classified as highly sensitive personal information, inaccessible to third parties without an individual’s consent…Read more >>>
Scientists in Europe have won a major battle over access to personal health data. A research coalition had worried that draft E.U. legislation would have sharply restricted scientific use of such data.
19 December 2015, Science Magazine
Three years ago, scientists had embraced the commission’s initial draft of the legislation, which strives to harmonize privacy rules for data collection, storage, and exchange across the continent. But last March, the European Parliament amended the legislation to mandate specific consent for the use of any data in medical research…Read more >>>
One morning in October, I was frantically scrambling around my apartment, trying to find a thumb drive. It’s probably the most valuable thumb drive I’ll ever have, and I couldn’t believe I had misplaced it. It contains the blueprint of who I am: My genome. Or at least, all the ways my genes differ from other people’s.
11 December 2015, CNBC
Our ability to map our own genes will be a bigger and bigger part of our medical care even in just the next decade. President Barack Obama has announced a Precision Medicine Initiative to accelerate what’s possible using this genetic information. And already, gene sequencing is making major impacts on cancer care, diagnostics and drug development.
But it’s still controversial how much genome sequencing is necessary, or even very useful on a personal level. Huge questions loom about cost, privacy and our own abilities to handle this kind of knowledge about ourselves….Read more >>>
16 November 2015, MIT Technology Review
The American public does not trust technology companies with personal health data, according to a survey from Rock Health, a venture capital firm focused on digital health. Venture investors have poured record amounts into health apps, electronic medical records, and wearable devices, including $4.3 billion last year. But Silicon Valley’s touch with consumers hasn’t yet translated into many big successes…Read more >>>
“If we each keep our genetic information secret, then we’re all going to die.” So says Bill Maris, founder, President and CEO of Google Ventures, that $2B investment firm with stakes in more than 280 startups, looking to spend
$425M on anti-aging and life extension this year.
6 November 2015, Genetic Literacy Project
This kind of hype downplays the limits and obstacles to providing reliable genetic information and using it to generate beneficial health impacts. It completely obscures the extent to which research as a system—corporate, academic, governmental, what have you—has been co-opted by private gains and has proceeded with little-to-no accountability to the public good and health…Read more >>>
4 November 2015, Genetic Literacy Project
It’s not just your medical records and genomic data that are personal, he explained — though many would be uncomfortable with sharing that information with acquaintances, coworkers, and employers.
But there are other things too. Genetic data might reveal something unexpected in a family with regard to paternity or adoption, Annas says…Read more >>>